Get Help

NURS FPX 6112 Assessment 2: Fall-Prevention Implementation

  • March 2, 2026
  • 12 min read
  • 2,847 downloads
  • 4.9

Assessment Overview:

NURS FPX 6112 Assessment 2 focuses on implementing a nurse-led, evidence-based fall-prevention bundle on a medical-surgical unit to reduce inpatient falls, improve process adherence, and optimize workflow. The bundle integrates risk screening, purposeful hourly rounding (4P model), toileting schedules, environmental safety measures, medication review, and patient/family education, guided by PDSA cycles for iterative improvement. The assessment emphasizes measurable outcomes, stakeholder engagement, staff training, and balancing measures to sustain patient safety improvements while maintaining staff efficiency.

Key Points

  • Purpose:
    • Reduce inpatient falls and related near misses.
    • Improve adherence to evidence-based fall-prevention practices.
  • SMART Aim:

    • Reduce fall rate from 5.8 to ≤ 3.0 per 1,000 patient-days within 4 months.
    • Increase hourly rounding adherence from 62% to ≥ 90%.
  • Fall-Prevention Bundle Components:
    • Risk Screening: Standardized fall-risk tool on admission and every 24 hours.
    • Purposeful Hourly Rounding (4P): Pain, Position, Personal needs, Placement/Path.
    • Toileting Schedules: High-risk patients scheduled and assisted.
    • Environmental Safety: Non-slip footwear, clutter-free paths, and adequate lighting.
    • Medication Review: High-risk meds assessed with pharmacist collaboration.
    • Patient/Family Education: One-page care plan at admission.
  • Implementation Framework:
    • PDSA cycles: Plan → Do → Study → Act.
    • Pilot on one team → refine workflow → expand unit-wide.
  • Measures & Data Collection:
    • Outcome: Fall rate per 1,000 patient-days.
    • Process: Rounding adherence, use of toileting schedules, med reviews.
    • Balancing: Nurse-reported time burden and workflow impact.
  • Stakeholder Engagement & Training:
    • Stakeholders include nursing staff, physicians, pharmacists, PT/OT, and the quality team.
    • The training includes micro-learning modules, quick-reference cards, and shift champions.
  • Challenges & Mitigation:
    • Time burden → highlight time savings from fewer interruptions.
    • Documentation → Simplify EHR workflow or use brief paper checks.
    • Education, clear escalation rules, and early wins are key strategies to overcome resistance.
  • Hypothetical Outcomes:
    • Rounding adherence increased to 92%, toileting compliance to 95%, and the fall rate dropped to 2.9 per 1,000 patient-days.

Key Objectives

  • Identify and articulate a relevant clinical nursing issue
  • Locate and evaluate credible, peer-reviewed research sources
  • Apply APA 7th edition formatting and citation standards
  • Demonstrate critical thinking and evidence synthesis

Understanding the Requirements

  • Length: 4-6 pages (excluding title page and references)
  • Format: APA 7th edition, double-spaced, 12pt Times New Roman
  • Sources: Minimum 3-5 peer-reviewed articles from the last 5 years
  • Content: Identify a clinical issue, locate credible sources, and explain how research informs practice

Criteria

  • Research Application
  • Source Quality
  • APA Formatting

Distinguished

  • Expertly applies research to clinical issue
  • All sources highly credible and current
  • Perfect APA 7th edition

Proficient

  • Adequately applies research
  • Most sources credible
  • Minor APA errors
  • Use CINAHL, PubMed, or Cochrane Library for high-quality sources
  • Ensure all citations match references exactly
  • Demonstrate critical thinking, not just summarizing sources
  • Proofread carefully for grammar and clarity

Complete Assessment Outline

Introduction

• Introduce the clinical issue or topic
• Explain its relevance to nursing practice
• State the purpose of the assessment

Research Process

• Describe databases and search strategies used
• Explain criteria for selecting credible sources
• Discuss evaluation of source quality and relevance

Evidence Synthesis

• Summarize key findings from research sources
• Compare and contrast different perspectives
• Identify patterns and themes in the evidence

Application to Practice

• Explain how research informs clinical decisions
• Provide specific examples of practice applications
• Discuss implications for patient outcomes

Conclusion

• Summarize key points and findings
• Reinforce the importance of evidence-based practice
• Suggest areas for future research or practice improvement

How to Pass NURS FPX 6112 Assessment 2: Fall-Prevention Implementation

  • Understand the Assignment Focus on enforcing a nanny-led fall-forestallment pack on a medical-surgical unit. 
  • Set a SMART aim example: reduce fall rate from 5.8 → ≤ 3.0 per 1,000 case-days and increase hourly rounding from 62 → ≥ 90. 
  • Use substantiation-grounded practices, including threat webbing, purposeful hourly rounding (4P model), toileting schedules, environmental safety, drug review, and case/family education. 
  • Plan Using PDSA Cycles: Plan → Do → Study → Act; airman on one platoon, upgrade, and also expand unit-wide. 
  • Collect Outcome Data Track fall rates, near misses, and adverse events per 1,000 case-days. 
  • Collect Process Data Cover rounding adherence, use of toileting schedules, and completion of high-threat med reviews. 
  • Collect Balancing Measures Assess nanny workload, workflow impact, and time burden per shift. 
  • Engage Stakeholders & Train Staff Use micro-learning, quick-reference cards, shift titleholders, and druggist collaboration. 
  • Anticipate & alleviate walls: Address time burden, attestation challenges, and staff resistance with education and workflow simplification. 
  • Report & Reflect: Present academic or real results, interpret advancements, and bandy leadership perceptions and sustainability plans.
Read More

Sample Assessment Paper

Introduction

Case falls remain a leading cause of inpatient morbidity, longer lengths of stay, and avoidable costs. Nurse-led prevention strategies that combine trouble netting, environmental variations, patient education, and bedside rounding have demonstrated effectiveness. This design implements a validation-predicated fall-prevention pack on a 30-bed medical-surgical unit and evaluates its impact on fall rates, process adherence, and nurse workflow. 

NURS FPX 6112 Assessment 2:Problem statement & SMART aim

Birth data (most recent 6 months) show a fall rate of 5.8 falls per 1,000 case-days on the unit and frequent near misses linked to unsupervised toileting. SMART end: Within 4 months of performance, reduce the unit fall rate from 5.8 to ≤ 3.0 per 1,000 case-days and increase hourly rounding adherence from 62 to ≥ 90. 

Literature/evidence summary (brief)

Regular reviews and validation-predicated toolkits (IHI, AHRQ, major nursing reviews) support multifactorial fall-prevention programs that include validated trouble netting, purposeful hourly (or purposeful) rounding, toileting schedules for high-trouble cases, bed/chair admonitions when applicable, medicine review, and case/family education. Importantly, staff engagement and workflow integration prognosticate sustainability. 

Intervention (Fall-Prevention Bundle)

  1. Homogenized trouble netting on admission and every 24 hours using the unit’s validated tool. 
  2. Purposeful hourly rounding (4P model: Pain, Position, Personal needs, Placement/Path) with a bedside rounding canon logged in the EHR. 
  3. A toileting schedule and a supported toileting policy are in place for cases identified as high-risk for falls. 
  4. Environmental safety canon (non-skid footwear, call light within reach, clutter-free path, respectable lighting). 
  5. medicine review for high-trouble meds (anodynes, antihypertensives) in collaboration with the apothecary. 
  6. Case/family education brief: teach-reverse at admission and publish a one-runner plan.

Implementation plan (PDSA approach)

  • Plan stakeholder meeting (nursing staff, croaker champion, apothecary, PT/OT, quality), confirm birth data, and produce job aids and EHR rounding flowsheet. 
  • Do (Airman) Airman on one nursing team (night shift) for 2 weeks. Use hourly rounding documentation and direct observation to measure adherence. 
  • Study diurnal run charts of rounding adherence and waterfall/near-miss counts; staff feedback via short checks. 
  • Act upgrade rounding timing, simplify documentation flux, add apothecary med-review triggers, and expand Birdman to day shifts for 4 weeks, also unit-wide rollout. 

Measures & data collection

  • Outgrowth Cascade per 1,000 case-days (yearly). 
  • Process of completed purposeful rounds per hour (examination/EHR), high-trouble cases on toileting schedule, and medicine reviews completed within 24 hours of admission for high-trouble meds. 
  • Balancing average time added per nurse per shift for rounding (tone-reported beats) and staff perception of workload (monthly 5-point check). 

Data analysis

Use run charts and Statistical Process Control (SPC) to describe special-cause change. Compare pre/post 3-month means and present trends. Use simple chi-squared or rate tests if sample size permits. 

Stakeholder engagement & training

  • Micro-learning (10–15 beats) during shift huddles with quick reference cards. 
  • Every shift, two unit titleholders receive coaching. 
  • Apothecary rounds twice daily for med reviews during birdman.

Anticipated barriers & mitigation

  • Perceived time burden emphasizes that rounding reduces call-tails and demonstrates time savings from lower interruptions. 
  • Documentation cargo applies a one-click EHR flux for rounding and allows brief paper checks during early birdman. 
  • Resistance to admonitions: Use bed/chairman admonitions only when clinically indicated and with clear escalation rules.

Hypothetical results are provided as an illustrative example that can be modeled

After two PDSA cycles and unit rollout, hourly rounding adherence rose from 62 to 92; toileting schedules were used for 95 of high-trouble cases; and the fall rate declined from 5.8 to 2.9 per 1,000 case-days (meets SMART end). The nurse check reported a flash of 3 beats per shift for rounding during the first month that returned to birth after workflow tweaks. 

Reflection & leadership implications

Successful performance demanded frontline engagement, transparent sharing of run-chart data, and rapid-fire acclimations predicated on nurse feedback. As a leader, I learned to balance frontline workflow realities with fidelity to validation. Ongoing sustainability will depend on coverlet criteria in monthly unit scorecards and maintaining champion places. 

Conclusion

A multifaceted, nurse-led fall-prevention pack that integrates trouble netting, purposeful rounding, toileting protocols, medicine review, and education can produce rapid-fire and sustainable reductions in inpatient falls when executed with iterative QI styles and strong frontline engagement.

Read More

References

  • Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2019). Substantiation: Grounded Practice in Nursing & Healthcare. A Guide to Stylish Practice (4th ed.). Wolters Kluwer. https://www.healthaffairs.org
  • Institute for Healthcare Improvement (n.d.). How to Ameliorate Improving Case Safety—Preventing Falls. IHI coffers. HealthIT.gov
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (n.d.). Precluding Cascade in hospitals A toolkit for perfecting quality of care. https://www.who.int
Read More

Rubric Breakdown

Criteria Distinguished Proficient Basic
Problem & SMART Aim Clearly stated, data-supported problem with measurable, realistic, time-bound aim Problem/aim mostly clear, partially measurable Problem or aim vague, incomplete, or not measurable
Evidence-Based Intervention Multi-component, literature-supported fall-prevention bundle Intervention included, partially evidence-based Limited or unsupported intervention
Implementation & PDSA Framework Detailed stepwise plan with pilot, iterative improvement, and stakeholder engagement Plan present but lacking some PDSA or stakeholder details Plan unclear or missing PDSA cycles
Evaluation Metrics Outcome, process, and balancing measures clearly defined and measurable Metrics included but partially defined Metrics missing or not aligned with aim
Barriers & Mitigation Multiple barriers identified with realistic solutions Some barriers and mitigation noted Minimal or no discussion of barriers/solutions
References & Evidence 3–6 credible scholarly/authoritative sources in APA 7th edition Some credible sources included Few or non-scholarly sources
Read More

Step-by-Step Guide

  1. Understand Assignment: apply a nanny-led, substantiation-grounded fall-forestallment pack on a medical-surgical unit. 
  2. Set SMART Aim Example: Reduce fall rate from 5.8 → ≤ 3.0 per 1,000 case-days; increase hourly rounding from 62 → ≥ 90 within 4 months. 
  3. Develop a fall-prevention bundle including threat webbing, purposeful hourly rounding (4P model), toileting schedules, environmental safety, drug review, and case/family education. 
  4. Plan Using PDSA Cycles (Plan → Do → Study → Act): Airman on one platoon → upgrade workflow → expand unit-wide. 
  5. Train Staff & Engage Stakeholders Micro-learning modules, quick-reference cards, shift titleholders, and interdisciplinary collaboration (drugstore, PT, OT). 
  6. Collect Outcome Data Track falls per 1,000 case-days, near misses, and adverse events. 
  7. Collect Process Data Cover rounding adherence, toileting schedule use, and high-threat drug review completion.
  8. Collect Balancing Measures Assess nanny workload, workflow impact, and time added per shift. 
  9. Anticipate & alleviate woes To address the time burden, we should emphasize effectiveness; for attestation, we can simplify the EHR or use paper checks; and to overcome resistance, we need to focus on early triumphs and establish clear escalation rules. 
  10. Report & Reflect Present pre/post data, estimate advancements, bandy leadership assignments, and plan for sustainability.
Read More

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ's)

Q1—How long should the paper be? 

Check your course rubric. generally 4–6 runners (not including the title runner and references), with clear captions. 

Q2—Do I need real unit data? 

A readily identified data set strengthens the submission. Still, use realistic academic numbers and fluently state hypotheticals if you don’t have them. 

Q3—How many references should I include? 

Aim for 3–6 credible sources (peer-reviewed, IHI/ AHRQ, authoritative nursing handbooks). 

Q4—What AHRQ, counts as a balancing measure? 

Any standard that identifies unintended consequences, such as increased nurse workload, delayed medication, or patient insulation enterprises, qualifies as a balancing measure. 

Q5—How many PDSA cycles are enough? 

Demonstrate at least 2 cycles (birdman → upgrade → expand). Quality is more important than volume—show iterative knowledge. 

Q6—Should I include an appendix (canon or script)? 

If allowed, yes. A one-runner bedside rounding canon or patient education script is largely precious. 

Q7—What statistical tests do I need? 

Run charts and Statistical Process Control (SPC) charts are generally sufficient. Still, a simple rate or chi-square test can be used if you present pre/post comparisons and sample sizes support it. Explain styles curtly.

Read More
NURS FPX 6112 Assessment 2

What You'll Get

  • How to pass Assessment
  • Complete assessment outline
  • Step-by-step guide
  • Rubric breakdown
  • Sample introduction
  • APA formatting tips
  • Reference list examples
Download Full Sample

Instant access • No credit card

You cannot copy content of this page

Get Instant Access to Sample Paper

Fill out the form below.