NURS FPX 5004 Assessment 4 requires a reflective analysis of personal leadership, collaboration, and ethical decision-making experiences in a professional setting. The assessment examines the application of democratic leadership, analytical and behavioral decision-making styles, assertive communication, and team-based collaboration strategies. It also evaluates ethical reasoning using the four principles from Principles of Biomedical Ethics and the LEADS Canada leadership framework. Through real-world examples—including an ethical pricing dilemma involving a flu medication—the learner demonstrates accountability, equity, and systems thinking in healthcare leadership.
Key Points of the Assessment
Ethical alignment with healthcare values
• Introduce the clinical issue or topic • Explain its relevance to nursing practice • State the purpose of the assessment
• Describe databases and search strategies used • Explain criteria for selecting credible sources • Discuss evaluation of source quality and relevance
• Summarize key findings from research sources • Compare and contrast different perspectives • Identify patterns and themes in the evidence
• Explain how research informs clinical decisions • Provide specific examples of practice applications • Discuss implications for patient outcomes
• Summarize key points and findings • Reinforce the importance of evidence-based practice • Suggest areas for future research or practice improvement
A leader is supposed to encourage cooperation and build confidence in platoon members. Team member confidence in one another’s moxie and experience helps bring interdependence, hence trust between platoon members. Team collaboration supports the attainment of organizational objects. The first part of this test will touch on the significance of leadership, leadership styles, decision-making styles, communication types, and the significance of cooperation. The alternate part will cover the significance of ethics. The corridor will cover collaboration and ethics in terms that reflect answers to a check given by Western Medical Enterprises.
I began working with ABC Laboratories Inc. as a marketing director for its Houston office three years ago.ABC Laboratories Inc. is a New York City-headquartered pharmaceutical pot. The association has twenty-four services in the United States of America. I was supervising a platoon of eleven when a new design was accepted. The laboratory’s exploration and development department introduced a new influenza medicine as part of the design.
The purpose of the new design was to familiarize oneself with the product and the target request and develop a marketing plan within three months. Since I was the head of the marketing platoon, I was responsible for communicating the details of the new design to the team. Emphasizing the various processes under observation was necessary. The platoon was told that the design would involve not just collaboration within the marketing platoon but also collaboration with professionals from other departments, like deals, finance, and exploration and development.
My team had members with varying age groups and ethnicities. I needed to engage every single one of them and draw on their experience, creativity, and professional skills. The democratic leadership style makes the team members more participative and offer suggestions when needed. My role was to ensure there were no deviations and hiccups in the project flow. Adopting the democratic style of leadership established an open-door policy for communication with the team members, promoting the sharing of ideas and feedback (Kaleem, Asad, & Khan, 2016).
This not only encouraged team members but also gave them a sense of ownership of the project since their inputs were truly given consideration in decision-making. This, in turn, reduced absenteeism and employee turnover and enhanced the efficiency of the team in achieving project goals. Decision-making is a key aspect of leadership, and I selected the analytical as well as the behavioral styles of decision-making. In accordance with the analytical style, I made sure to gather and analyze all project data to make decisions.
Though time-consuming, the decision-making style has the advantage of filling in potential loopholes when deciding on a course of action. The behavioral style assisted me in building trust within the team since I consulted the team members before making any final decision (Azeska, Starc, & Kevereski, 2017). This procedure served to calm any fears members may have had and kept them informed about the progress of the project.
Despite the success of the project, in retrospect, I would have used the behavioral style of decision-making much more than the analytical style. Such an approach would have lessened the amount of time that I spent in the planning stage, which would have seen the team accomplish the project’s goals within a shorter period of time (Azeska et al., 2017).
Effective communication makes sure that team members know objectives and there is no duplication of the line of action. It was necessary to make sure communication among the marketing team members was unambiguous. It was also necessary that communication among the marketing team and other department teams be unambiguous and objective. Clarity in communicating project requirements encouraged coordination among the team members. As a leader, I communicated assertively.
As a result, I was able to say what I think and give comments honestly and truthfully while, at the same time, paying attention to and valuing suggestions and opinions by my team members (Bocar, 2017). Such behavior was true to my style of leadership and decision-making that I had selected. I also maintained open channels of communication, both formal and informal, to ensure clarity in the tasks at hand. The team members were assured that they could come to me to resolve any issues or complaints, making them feel more important to the organization. This gave the team more confidence in my role as a leader.
The team’s dedication to working efficiently and effectively to finish the project demonstrated the appropriate combination of leadership and communication styles. As a leader, it was my role to see that effective cooperation between members from diverse ethnic groups, ages, and specialties existed.Such cooperation was essential for knowledge sharing and developing trust between them, resulting in the successful accomplishment of targets and goals.
A reward system based on the team was established to motivate team members to work better both individually and collaboratively. In this system, every financial or nonfinancial motivation was associated with the fulfillment of team objectives. This motivates team members to work together, gain confidence in each other’s abilities, and assign tasks based on their skills. This results in the attainment of project goals and allows team members to build on one another’s work. High levels of interdependence, both within the team and with other departments, and a cooperative environment enhance collaboration (Gomez-Mejia & Franco-Santos, 2015).
Utilizing the team-based reward system, I managed to establish a sense of “we” rather than “me” within my team. The team initially resisted this approach, fearing that below-average performers would undermine the team’s incentives. But I got the whole team to trust each other’s strengths and help each other through one-on-one talks, workshops, mentoring, and outbound training. My involvement in this project taught me the significance of comprehending the requirements of the team and making them part of realizing the project’s goals.
As a health care administrator, I have encountered ethical dilemmas that can have a direct influence on the patients’ and their families’ lives. To effectively address these dilemmas, I draw upon the code of ethics formulated by James Childress and Tom Beauchamp in Principles of Biomedical Ethics. The code of ethics presents guidelines meant to assist health care professionals in addressing ethical dilemmas with honesty and integrity.
The code of ethics paper outlines four principles: autonomy, justice, beneficence, and non-maleficence. An ethical dilemma exists when two or more of the ethical principles collide with each other. When I encounter an ethical dilemma in the workplace, I use the LEADS framework—an acronym for lead self, engage others, achieve results, develop coalitions, and systems transformation—to make an equitable decision (Levitt, 2014). The LEADS framework outlines the skills and knowledge an ethical leader must possess across all levels of an organization.
The core purpose of the health care industry is to maintain or enhance the overall standard of living and develop a system of healthcare that is cost-effective and convenient. Being the marketing manager, I recently encountered an ethical problem concerning a new drug launched by our organization to cure the flu epidemic in the United States of America.
The drug proved to be very effective during its trial phases and was cleared for sale. The drug consisted of three chemical compounds that could cure the flu and was marketed at $1,500 for five tablets. For the successful treatment of influenza, a person would probably have to take at least fifteen pills. A survey of the local target market showed that 62% of the patients suffering from influenza belonged to low-income groups.
These people could not afford such a costly drug. Justice, which is an ethical principle, underscores that medical resources and medical facilities must be equally and justly distributed among everyone who needs them. Likewise, the principle of nonmaleficence underscores that a health care executive must conduct himself or herself with a patient’s well-being in mind and actively work to avoid causing harm to the patient (Levitt, 2014).
Upon understanding the targeted audience, we realized marketing a costly product to the majority low-income population violated the ethical standards of the health care profession. While conducting an internal survey, we observed that the drug was not distributed equally. Individuals from high-income backgrounds could readily afford the drug. But individuals from low-income backgrounds, who were predominantly impacted by the disease, could not afford the drug and ended up being seriously ill. The project’s original goals clashed with the moral principles of justice and non-maleficence, leading to an ethical dilemma.
The primary concern with this medication was its cost. To fix this, I established a committee with representatives from the research and development, sales, and finance departments. We clearly stated the committee’s purpose. The committee came up with procedures to reduce the cost of the drug and to enhance its strength so that a reduced dosage would be effective. After thoroughly weighing ethical considerations, the committee decided to outsource the development and research of the drug to another entity.
This entity was able to develop the drug at a significantly lower price. Another way we cut the cost of the drug was by substituting one of the compounds in the drug with a less expensive, yet equally effective, substitute. The cost of the drug was therefore cut to $750 for 10 pills, which was within reach of low-income families. Because the influenza epidemic was huge, these drugs were distributed all over the country and earned huge profits for the company. I could effectively solve the ethical dilemma using the LEADS framework.
A team leader of people with diverse backgrounds needs to comprehend the appropriate leadership styles, decision-making methods, and communication patterns. This enables the team to be motivated and feel part of organizational objectives. Although motivation is a significant leadership responsibility, ensuring actions are ethical is also necessary.
A leader is not only accountable for the morale of the team they lead; they are also accountable to the organization’s internal and external stakeholders. Adhering to a set of ethics guidelines sets an example for the team and the entire organization regarding ethical decision-making.
Azeska, A., Starc, J., & Kevereski, L. (2017).Decision—timber and operation styles and personality confines of academy headliners.International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.5937/IJCRSEE1702047A
Bocar, A. C. (2017). Aggressive, unresistant, and assertive Which communication style is generally used by council scholars? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2956807
Ethical decision-making in a caring terrain The four principles and LEADS. Healthcare Management Forum, 27(2), 105–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hcmf.2014.03.013
| Criteria | Distinguished (Exemplary) | Proficient | Basic | Non-Performance |
| Leadership Self-Reflection | Deep, critical reflection on leadership strengths, weaknesses, and growth areas. | Clear reflection with relevant examples. | Limited personal insight. | No reflection provided. |
| Application of Leadership Theory | Clearly connects democratic leadership and decision-making styles to outcomes. | Describes leadership styles with some connection to results. | Minimal theory application. | No leadership theory referenced. |
| Collaboration Analysis | Thorough explanation of teamwork strategies, interdependence, and reward systems. | Adequate discussion of collaboration. | Basic mention of teamwork. | No collaboration analysis. |
| Ethical Framework Integration | Strong application of ethical principles and LEADS framework to real dilemma. | Identifies ethical principles with moderate explanation. | Mentions ethics but lacks depth. | No ethical framework discussed. |
| Problem Resolution Strategy | Demonstrates structured, ethical, and system-level decision-making process. | Describes solution with some rationale. | Limited explanation of resolution. | No clear resolution strategy. |
| Professional Communication & APA | Scholarly tone, organized structure, correct citations. | Minor clarity or APA issues. | Frequent writing or citation errors. | Poorly written or incomplete. |
The ethical dilemma was the conflict between the company’s fiscal pretensions and the ethical principles of justice and non-maleficence. The flu medicine was too precious for the low-income population who demanded it most, making it an unapproachable and potentially dangerous product.
The author used a popular leadership style to encourage platoon input, and they employed both logical and behavioral decision-making styles.
Collaboration was fostered through a platoon-grounded price system that motivated members to work together and support one another, erecting a sense of collaborative power.
Instant access • No credit card
You cannot copy content of this page
Fill out the form below.