NURS FPX 4020 Assessment 2 focuses on addressing patient identification errors at Arnold Palmer Hospital for Children using Root Cause Analysis (RCA) and evidence-based safety strategies. The case scenario involving pediatric patients Julia and Jenny highlights how misidentified wristbands led to incorrect vaccine administration, resulting in adverse reactions, missed vaccinations, family distress, and decreased trust in the healthcare system. The RCA identifies key contributing factors, including communication breakdowns, failure to follow standardized identification protocols, workload pressures, human error, and limitations in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) system.
To prevent future errors, the safety improvement plan incorporates evidence-based interventions such as barcode scanning systems, Barcode Medication Administration (BCMA), biometric identification technologies (e.g., iris recognition), standardized patient identification protocols, and staff training. The plan includes a phased implementation timeline, integration of existing organizational resources (EHR systems, IT support, and Quality Improvement teams), and additional support such as vendor collaboration and financial investment. Clear goals include reducing patient identification errors, improving pediatric safety outcomes, strengthening staff competency, enhancing family trust, and promoting a strong culture of safety. Continuous monitoring and evaluation will ensure sustained improvements and long-term quality enhancement.
• Introduce the clinical issue or topic • Explain its relevance to nursing practice • State the purpose of the assessment
• Describe databases and search strategies used • Explain criteria for selecting credible sources • Discuss evaluation of source quality and relevance
• Summarize key findings from research sources • Compare and contrast different perspectives • Identify patterns and themes in the evidence
• Explain how research informs clinical decisions • Provide specific examples of practice applications • Discuss implications for patient outcomes
• Summarize key points and findings • Reinforce the importance of evidence-based practice • Suggest areas for future research or practice improvement
This assessment highlights the issue of patient identification crimes prevailing in Arnold Palmer Hospital. This sanatorium dedicates itself to serving children, specifically furnishing pediatric healthcare services. In this sanatorium, the arising case-identification crimes have impacted the health of multitudinous children. This paper will claw into root-cause analysis of misemployed cases and crimes in patient identification. Likewise, the safety improvement plan will be developed to address the growing issue.
In Arnold Palmer Hospital for Children, one fine day, two pediatric cases named Julia and Jenny came for vaccination. Their identification irons were erroneously shifted, and Julia entered the vaccinations intended for Jenny and vice versa. The nurse administering the vaccinations detected the error when Julia’s medical history did not match the Electronic Health Records (EHR) information. The nurse realized the case’s identification did not match the digital records, leading to further exploration.
This misidentification of cases affected both cases, as Julia entered vaccines that were not suited to her medical condition and endured some antipathetic responses as adverse goods. Also, Jenny was in trouble due to constricting conditions due to missed vaccinations, which her health condition demanded. The families involved experienced stress and torture as a result of this incident, which also damaged their faith in medical systems.
Follow the standard protocol for patient identification during vaccination. The nurse did not corroborate the case’s identity by cross-checking identification particulars and EHR data to execute the father’s vaccination procedure properly. Likewise, there was a demand for further communication between the administrator staff responsible for assigning patient identification irons and the nursing staff responsible for administering the vaccinations (Romano et al., 2021). Also, the sanatorium’s vaccination department’s high workload and fast-paced nature must have contributed to the oversight and response in this event.
Firstly, the EHR system failed to raise an alert for a mismatch in patient identification, pressing an implicit excrescence within the technology and taking further upgrades and point installation (Riplinger et al., 2020). Hence, the root-cause analysis indicates the procedural breakdowns, communication gap, moral and environmental crimes, and the need for an upgraded EHR system with better-aligned features.
Case identification crimes impact patient safety and require the implementation of confirmation-tested strategies to ensure that correct care treatments are delivered to the right patients. These strategies include using a barcoding system to correctly identify cases for drug administration and other curative measures similar to surgeries. The barcode system allows healthcare professionals to give a case a specific barcode as an identifier in the form of a wristband and deliver care treatments based on the barcodes distributed (Barakat & Franklin, 2020).
One illustration of this system is Barcode Medication Administration, in which the barcode of a case’s wristband is matched with a barcode on the drug to administer the correct drug to the right case without making an error in patient identification (Owens et al., 2020). Literature states that about 236 patient identification crimes passed when cases lost cuff identifiers (Rahmawati et al., 2020). This approach demanded a robust identification system for cases, similar to biometric systems, like iris biometric systems, where iris scanning for each case is conducted to store as a template. This scrutinized template matches the case for routine care treatment deliveries (Anne et al., 2020).
Other strategies include developing and administering standardized protocols for patient identification, including using registries for verification. Administering these registries during patient hassles will reduce the frequency of patient misidentification, particularly before administering specifics or vaccines (Riplinger et al., 2020). Also, healthcare professionals must establish regular communication channels, analogous to huddles or briefings, to club case identification protocols and address any enterprises or challenges the healthcare team faces.
Likewise, healthcare professionals must be trained on the significance of patient identification and ways to palliate mortal crimes that lead to patient detriment (Vaismoradi et al., 2020). Implementing these strategies, supported by literature and studies, can effectively reduce patient identification crimes, thereby enhancing patient safety and improving patient experience.
The safety enhancement plan can effectively reduce cases of misidentification and subsequent counteraccusations related to patient safety. This plan will include administering enhanced barcoding technology, developing standardized protocols and registries for patient identification, and training for healthcare staff. The sanatorium administration will integrate an advanced barcoding system that extends beyond drug administration to include patient identification irons. The healthcare installation can ensure robust verification by expanding barcoding technology to patient identification, reducing misidentification risks (Romano et al., 2021).
Healthcare leadership will play a part in developing and administering standardized protocols and registries for patient identification, emphasizing barcode scanning as a vital step. Combined with registries, these procedures produce a regular approach to patient identification and reduce the liability of crimes. Originally, the plan will include administering ongoing mortal factors training for healthcare, where leaders will emphasize the significance of attention to detail in patient identification.
Educating staff on common mortal crimes that lead to patient identification crimes will empower them with strategies to help them and enhance the safety culture (Romano et al., 2021). The key objectives of this safety enhancement plan are to reduce patient identification crimes, enhance patient safety, improve case and family satisfaction, and increase staff awareness and skills in patient identification.
The timeline for the proposed enhancement plan will be about once. In the first two months, the healthcare association will assess current case identification processes and areas for enhancement. Executive staff will implement a sophisticated barcoding system to identify cases in months three and four. These steps will be followed by developing and propagating standardized protocols and inaugurating training for healthcare staff and the executive labor force in the coming two months to promote patient safety through correct case identification. Originally, the coming four months will include monitoring and assessing the efficacy of enforced changes and plans as demanded, based on feedback and issues (Vaismoradi et al., 2020).
Organizational resources such as EHR systems can efficiently enhance the precisely curated safety enhancement plan. The IT professionals can be approached to assess the lagging features of the presently used EHR, which can alarm the healthcare professionals in case of misidentification. Additionally, the hospital administration and leadership team can collaborate with quality improvement teams to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of implemented strategies.
The ongoing feedback from the QI platoon can contribute to nonstop enhancement in reducing identification crimes and enhancing patient safety (Alomari et al., 2020). In addition to using the currently available resources, the healthcare organization may need additional resources for the training department, such as brochures for educating staff to conduct technical training programs on patient identification and safety initiatives.
Additionally, healthcare administration will require vendor support to effectively integrate the barcoding system. Fiscal coffers will be demanded to buy and easily integrate the technology and training sessions (Riplinger et al., 2020). Given the central part of technology within the safety enhancement plan, uniting with the IT department is a high precedent, as it directly impacts the successful performance of the barcoding system. Other important factors include the involvement of the Quality Improvement (QI) team and the allocation of training and development resources to educate healthcare professionals, ensuring comprehensive inpatient safety through a thorough understanding of recommended protocols (Alomari et al., 2020).
The root-cause analysis was performed for two cases to address the case identification crimes for children within Arnold Palmer Hospital. The root causes were a lack of protocols for enhanced patient safety and identification of cases, communication breakdowns, hamstrung technology, and mortal error. This demanded the operation of evidence-tested practices, exercising which a safety improvement plan is drafted.
This plan includes integrating a barcoding system, training staff, and administering protocols for better case identification. It’s essential to consider the readily available resources that can be strategically used to ameliorate the effectiveness of safety improvement plans. The demanded resources include financial and external resources analogous to merchandisers and counsels to apply the plan for enhancing patient safety and reducing identification crimes during patient hassles.
Rahmawati, T. W., Sari, D. R., Ratri, D. R., & Hasyim, M. (2020). Patient identification in wards: What influences nurses’ compliance? Jurnal Medicoeticolegal Dan Manajemen Rumah Sakit, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.18196/jmmr.92121
Riplinger, L., Piera-Jiménez, J., & Dooling, J. P. (2020). The article discusses the approaches, implications, and findings of patient identification techniques. Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 29(1), 81–86. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7442501/
Romano, R., Marletta, G., Sollami, A., La Sala, R., Sarli, L., Artioli, G., & Nitro, M. (2021). The safety of care focused on patient identity: An observational study. Acta Bio Medica: Atenei Parmensis, 92(Suppl 2), e2021038. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v92iS2.11328
Vaismoradi, M., Tella, S., A. Logan, P., Khakurel, J., & Vizcaya-Moreno, F. (2020). Nurses’ adherence to patient safety principles: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(6), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17062028
| Criteria | Distinguished (A) | Proficient (B) | Basic (C) | Non-Performance (F) |
| Root Cause Analysis (RCA) | Thorough analysis identifying procedural, human, communication, and system errors | Mostly accurate; minor gaps | Basic identification; lacks depth | Missing or inaccurate |
| Evidence-Based Strategies | Comprehensive integration of barcoding, biometrics, protocols, and training | Mostly included; minor omissions | Limited strategies; few evidence-based approaches | Not addressed |
| Safety Improvement Plan | Clear, phased plan with timeline, resource allocation, and measurable goals | Mostly clear; minor gaps in plan or timeline | Basic plan; lacks details or measurable outcomes | No plan provided |
| Use of Organizational Resources | Clearly identifies existing and needed resources; integrates them effectively | Mostly clear; minor omissions | Limited discussion of resources | Missing or inaccurate |
| Impact on Patient Safety and Quality | Explains how strategies reduce errors, enhance safety, improve trust, and foster culture | Mostly explained; minor gaps | Basic explanation; lacks examples | Not addressed |
| Clarity, Organization, and References | Well-structured, logical, scholarly references cited | Mostly organized; minor clarity issues | Some organization issues; limited references | Disorganized; missing references |
NURS FPX 4020 Assessment 2 addresses patient identification crimes at Arnold Palmer Hospital, focusing on how they affect pediatric safety and issues.
RCA helps find the main causes of crimes, similar to serious misunderstandings, communication failures, and problems in the system, including specific improvements.
Strategies include barcode scanning systems, biometric identification styles, homogenized protocols, communication advancements, and staff training.
The plan is designed for a 12-month timeline, divided into phases of assessment, technology, drugs, staff training, and evaluation.
The plan demands current EHR systems, IT and quality enhancement armies, staff training coffers, dealer support, and fiscal investment for new technologies.
Issues include reduced misidentification crimes, bettered patient safety, enhanced case and family trust, and strengthened organizational safety culture.
Instant access • No credit card
You cannot copy content of this page
Fill out the form below.