NHS FPX 8040 Assessment 2 builds directly on Assessment 1. While Part 1 focused on defining the problem (nursing shortage) and creating a SMART project aim, Part 2 focuses on leadership, governance, team structure, and stakeholder engagement.
In NHS FPX 8040 Assessment 2, you expand the project charter by identifying:
Using the nursing shortage initiative at Lima Memorial Hospital, this assessment evaluates your ability to demonstrate executive-level systems leadership and interdisciplinary collaboration.
At the doctoral level, this assignment tests your ability to:
This is not just about naming roles — it is about demonstrating strategic alignment and systems thinking.
• Introduce the clinical issue or topic • Explain its relevance to nursing practice • State the purpose of the assessment
• Describe databases and search strategies used • Explain criteria for selecting credible sources • Discuss evaluation of source quality and relevance
• Summarize key findings from research sources • Compare and contrast different perspectives • Identify patterns and themes in the evidence
• Explain how research informs clinical decisions • Provide specific examples of practice applications • Discuss implications for patient outcomes
• Summarize key points and findings • Reinforce the importance of evidence-based practice • Suggest areas for future research or practice improvement
Project Name
Healing the Workforce: Addressing Nursing Shortages at Lima Memorial Hospital
NHS FPX 8040 Assessment 2 Lima Memorial Hospital is facing a significant challenge with a nursing insufficiency, negatively impacting healthcare delivery and case issues. Of the 500 approved registered nursing positions, 75 remain vacant, leading to increased workloads for the remaining staff, elevated collapse rates, and compromised patient care quality. The design aims to reduce these vacancies to 25 within 12 months, easing staff workload and enhancing the overall quality of care.
Recent checks conducted at Lima Memorial Hospital reveal that 65 of the nursing staff report high-collapse situations, while 50 express concerns about compromised patient safety due to staffing crunches. This aligns with global trends, where roughly three million fresh nurses are demanded in the U.S. to close the gap (Tamata & Mohammadnezhad, 2022). Likewise, the Joint Commission highlights the significance of maintaining respectable staffing situations to ensure safe, effective care (Baker, 2022). Addressing this deficiency is essential for financial sustainability, resource optimization, and indifferent access to quality healthcare (Udod, 2023).
The nursing deficiency at Lima Memorial Hospital, driven by shy recovery and retention strategies, compromises care quality, increases staff development, and undermines overall staff well-being. Targeted interventions are demanded to fill these vacancies and meliorate workflows for enhanced case issues.
SMART Objectives
This design seeks to reduce nursing development and vacancies at Lima Memorial Hospital, abating the number of vacant positions from 75 to 25 within 12 months. This will benefit nurses by reducing workload and collapse while enhancing patient care quality. Validation-predicated strategies, analogous to competitive hires, professional development, and a dutiful plan, will be executed.
Tamata, A. T., & Mohammadnezhad, M. (2022). A methodical review study on the factors affecting the deficit of the nursing pool in the hospitals. Nursing Open, 10(3), 1247 – 1257. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1434
Udod, S. (2023). A call for critical action inventions for nanny retention in addressing the nursing deficit. Nursing Reports, 13(1), 145–147. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep13010015
| Criteria | Basic Performance | Proficient Performance | Distinguished Performance (Target Level) |
| Recap of Project Overview | Mentions nursing shortage briefly | Clearly summarizes gap and SMART aim | Concise, strategic recap that links problem to need for governance and leadership |
| Project Team Identification | Lists roles without explanation | Identifies roles and basic responsibilities | Clearly defines each member’s title, department, strategic contribution, and interprofessional collaboration impact |
| Executive Sponsor & Governance | Mentions sponsor role | Explains sponsor support and oversight | Demonstrates formal reporting structure, accountability processes, and leadership oversight mechanisms |
| Leadership Style Application | Names leadership styles | Explains transformational or servant leadership | Critically analyzes how leadership theory supports engagement, retention, and change sustainability |
| Stakeholder Identification | Lists stakeholders | Explains connection and impact | Provides detailed analysis of connection, influence, risks, engagement strategy, and contribution |
| Interdisciplinary Collaboration | States team is multidisciplinary | Describes roles from HR, finance, QI | Demonstrates systems-level integration of departments to address financial, clinical, and workforce dimensions |
| Evidence Support | Limited references | Uses 2–3 scholarly sources | Integrates 3–5 recent scholarly sources with synthesis and application to leadership structure |
| Alignment to Quality & Safety | Mentions patient care impact | Connects staffing to quality | Explicitly links project to patient safety, financial sustainability, accreditation standards |
| Clarity & Organization | Basic organization | Logical structure | Executive-level clarity, professional tone, and seamless flow |
| APA & Scholarly Writing | Minor APA errors | Mostly correct APA | Perfect APA formatting, scholarly tone, doctoral-level writing |
Follow these ways to structure your assessment document effectively.
The design team consists of the individualities directly responsible for the design’s day-to-day work, performance, and overall success. Stakeholders, on the other hand, are individualities or groups who can impact the design or are impacted by it. They don’t inevitably perform design tasks, but their sword heft and support are vital for the design’s ultimate success.
A health care problem like a nursing deficiency is multifaceted. It’s not just a nursing issue; it’s a financial, administrative, and quality issue as well. A multidisciplinary team brings together different moxie—from finance to mortal resources to quality assurance—to produce a further comprehensive and robust result. This approach also glosses over the interprofessional collaboration that is central to modern health care delivery.
A well-defined team structure ensures clarity and responsibility. When each member’s part and donation are fluently outlined, there is lower confusion, lower overlap, and more effective use of resources. This clear structure, coupled with strong leadership, empowers team members to work toward a sharing thing, which is vital for meeting the design’s objectives and timeline.
Instant access • No credit card
You cannot copy content of this page
Fill out the form below.