Get Help

NURS FPX 9000 Assessment 2: Developing the DNP Project Proposal

  • February 26, 2026
  • 12 min read
  • 2,847 downloads
  • 4.9

Assessment Overview:

NURS FPX 9000 Assessment 2: focuses on creating a comprehensive DNP project proposal. This step transforms the problem identified in Assessment 1 into a structured plan for implementing an evidence-based intervention. The proposal should clearly define the clinical or organizational problem, outline the theoretical framework, specify the intervention, and describe methods for data collection and analysis.An exemplary proposal demonstrates clear alignment between problem, intervention, evidence, and evaluation plan while addressing ethical, practical, and organizational considerations.

Key Objectives

  • Identify and articulate a relevant clinical nursing issue
  • Locate and evaluate credible, peer-reviewed research sources
  • Apply APA 7th edition formatting and citation standards
  • Demonstrate critical thinking and evidence synthesis

Understanding the Requirements

  • Length: 4-6 pages (excluding title page and references)
  • Format: APA 7th edition, double-spaced, 12pt Times New Roman
  • Sources: Minimum 3-5 peer-reviewed articles from the last 5 years
  • Content: Identify a clinical issue, locate credible sources, and explain how research informs practice

Criteria

  • Research Application
  • Source Quality
  • APA Formatting

Distinguished

  • Expertly applies research to clinical issue
  • All sources highly credible and current
  • Perfect APA 7th edition

Proficient

  • Adequately applies research
  • Most sources credible
  • Minor APA errors
  • Use CINAHL, PubMed, or Cochrane Library for high-quality sources
  • Ensure all citations match references exactly
  • Demonstrate critical thinking, not just summarizing sources
  • Proofread carefully for grammar and clarity

Complete Assessment Outline

Introduction

• Introduce the clinical issue or topic
• Explain its relevance to nursing practice
• State the purpose of the assessment

Research Process

• Describe databases and search strategies used
• Explain criteria for selecting credible sources
• Discuss evaluation of source quality and relevance

Evidence Synthesis

• Summarize key findings from research sources
• Compare and contrast different perspectives
• Identify patterns and themes in the evidence

Application to Practice

• Explain how research informs clinical decisions
• Provide specific examples of practice applications
• Discuss implications for patient outcomes

Conclusion

• Summarize key points and findings
• Reinforce the importance of evidence-based practice
• Suggest areas for future research or practice improvement

How to Pass NURS FPX 9000 Assessment 2: Developing the DNP Project Proposal

  • Easily State the Problem – Begin with the clinical or organizational issue your design addresses. 
  • Define the Purpose—Explain what your DNP design aims to achieve and why it matters. 
  • Set SMART objects – Make objects Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Applicable, and Time-bound. 
  • Choose a theoretical framework—Apply a model like Pender’s HPM, Kotter’s change model, or Lewin’s proposition to guide your design. 
  • Support with substantiation – Include literature that justifies your intervention, especially nanny-led or digital strategies. 
  • Describe Study Design & Styles – Explain design type (e.g., quasi-experimental), setting, population, sample size, and addition/rejection criteria. 
  • Detail the Intervention—Specify the way, tools, education sessions, or digital monuments used for perpetration. 
  • Plan Data Collection & Analysis – Identify dimension tools (MMAS-8, EHR data), analysis styles, and statistical tests. 
  • Address Ethics—Include IRB blessing, informed consent, HIPAA compliance, and adherence to ethical principles. 
  • Explain anticipated issues & counteraccusations – Predict results (adherence rates, BP control) and describe counteraccusations for practice, leadership, and sustainability. 
Read More

Sample Assessment Paper

Introduction

A successful Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) design requires a clear and comprehensive offer outlining the problem, a confirmation-tested frame, methodology, and anticipated issues. The offer serves as a design for rephrasing exploration into practice to ameliorate healthcare issues and organizational performance. 

This paper presents a DNP design offer aimed at perfecting drug adherence among hypertensive cases in a primary care setting through a confirmation-tested, nanny-led intervention using digital health tools and patient education. 

Background of the Problem

A successful Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) design requires a clear and comprehensive offer outlining the problem, a confirmation-tested frame, methodology, and anticipated issues. The offer serves as a design for rephrasing exploration into practice to ameliorate healthcare issues and organizational performance. 

This paper presents a DNP design offer aimed at perfecting drug adherence among hypertensive cases in a primary care setting through a confirmation-tested, nanny-led intervention using digital health tools and patient education. 

Purpose Statement

The purpose of this DNP design is to meliorate drug adherence among grown-ups with hypertension in a primary care setting through the performance of a digital memorial system and nanny-led adherence education program. 

Project Objectives 

  1. Specific instrument: a digital drug memorial system integrated with the case gate. 
  2. Measurable increase in drug adherence rates by 25 within six months. 
  3. Attainable: Give nanny-led education to all hypertensive cases enrolled in the clinic’s habitual care operation program. 
  4. Applicable: Align with organizational intentions to reduce unbridled hypertension rates. 
  5. Time-bound: Evaluate issues within six months of design induction. 

NURS FPX 9000 Assessment 2: Evidence-Based Framework

  • The DNP design is guided by Pender’s Health Promotion Model (HPM) and Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model. 
  • Pender’s HPM emphasizes the significance of patient provocation, perceived walls, and tone effectiveness in espousing healthy conduct similar to drug adherence. 
  • Kotter’s Change Model provides a structured approach to administering organizational change by establishing urgency, creating a vision, erecting a guiding coalition, and sustaining enhancement. 
  • These fabrics support the integration of behavioral and system-position strategies to ameliorate adherence and ensure sustainable change. 

Literature Review

  • Research explosively supports multimodal, nanny-led interventions to meliorate drug adherence. 
  • Digital monitors and telehealth studies by Chen et al. (2022) and Bosworth et al. (2021) show that mobile-assisted monitors bettered adherence by 20–30. 
  • Motivational canvassing: Ogedegbe et al. (2021) demonstrated that motivational canvassing led to better long-term adherence among hypertensive cases. 
  • Case education: Brown et al. (2020) emphasized the significance of nanny-driven education to ameliorate tone-operation chops. 
  • These findings justify using a combined approach—digital technology plus substantiated nursing interventions—to promote adherence. 

Project Design and Methods

Design

A quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design will be used to assess the effectiveness of the intervention on drug adherence and blood pressure control. 

Setting

The study will take place in a primary care clinic that serves roughly 5,000 adult cases and has a devoted habitual complaint resolution program. 

Population and Sample

  • Fresh Criteria: Grown-ups aged 30–75 diagnosed with hypertension for at least 6 months. 
  • Rejection Criteria: Cases that present cognitive impairments, terminal illness, or warrant access to a smartphone or case gate are barred.
  • Sample Size: roughly 50–60 actors.

Intervention

  • performance of a digital memorial system integrated with the electronic health record (EHR). 
  • nanny-led education sessions (30 beats each) on drug operations and life variations. 
  • Follow-up phone calls every two weeks to support adherence and address walls.

Data Collection and Analysis

Data Collection Tools

  1. Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8)—to measure adherence. 
  2. EHR data to track traditional cache rates and blood pressure readings. 

Data Analysis

  • Descriptive statistics for demographic data. 
  • Paired t-tests to compare pre- and post-intervention adherence scores. 
  • We’ll use regression analysis to pinpoint the factors that contribute to the enhancement in adherence. 
  • All data will be anatomized using SPSS software, with a significance position set at p < 0.05. 

Ethical Considerations

  • Institutional Review Board (IRB) blessing will be attained before data collection. 
  • Actors will give informed concurrence and be assured of confidentiality under HIPAA guidelines. 
  • Data will be stored securely on confined, password-protected systems. 
  • The study adheres to ethical principles outlined in the Belmont Report (1979)—respect for persons, beneficence, and justice. 

Expected Outcomes

  • The study aims to increase drug adherence by at least 25 percent. 
  • The mean systolic blood pressure bettered by roughly 10 mmHg. 
  • This led to an increase in patient engagement and satisfaction with their care. 
  • The design allows for the sustainable integration of digital tools into routine complaint operation workflows. 

Implications for Nursing Practice

This design supports DNP capabilities by 

  • Enhancing substantiation-based leadership in habitual complaint operations. 
  • This design also fosters interprofessional collaboration among nurses, caregivers, and druggists. 
  • We are using health informatics to improve patient care. 

The findings can inform organizational programs and contribute to system-wide relinquishment of nanny-led adherence programs. 

Conclusion

This DNP design offer outlines a practical, confirmation-tested approach to perfecting drug adherence among hypertensive cases. By integrating digital monuments, nanny-led education, and motivational support, the design aims to alleviate health issues and advance nursing leadership in habitual complaint operation.

Read More

References

  • Belmont Report (1979). The report provides ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects in exploration. National Commission for the Protection of Mortal Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Exploration. 
  • Bosworth, H. B., Olsen, M. K., & Granger, B. B. (2021). Drug adherence A call for better measures to align with the patient experience. American Heart Journal, 240, 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2021.06.006
  • Brown, M. T., Bussell, J., & Dutta, S. (2020). Drug adherence: Who cares? Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 95(4), 733–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.11.026
  • Chen, Y., Li, J., & Wang, Z. (2022). Effectiveness of mobile-grounded interventions on drug adherence in cases with hypertension: A meta-analysis. Journal of Hypertension, 40(6), 1248–1257. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000003098
  • Ogedegbe, G., Schoenthaler, A., & Richardson, T. (2021). The study focused on nurse-led interventions aimed at enhancing medication adherence in patients with hypertension. Journal of Clinical Hypertension, 23(12), 2009–2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.1440
Read More

Rubric Breakdown

Criteria Exemplary (4) Proficient (3) Developing (2) Needs Improvement (1)
Problem & Purpose Statement Clearly defines clinical problem, purpose, and SMART objectives aligned with practice needs. Problem and purpose clear; minor gaps in specificity or alignment. Problem or objectives partially defined; lacks clarity. Problem and purpose unclear or missing.
Theoretical Framework Explicit use of relevant theory/model guiding project design and intervention. Theory/model mentioned with partial integration. Theory/model included but poorly connected to project. No theoretical framework used or irrelevant.
Evidence & Literature Support Summarizes current, peer-reviewed evidence clearly supporting intervention. Adequate evidence; minor gaps in relevance or detail. Limited evidence; lacks depth or relevance. Evidence missing or unrelated to intervention.
Project Design & Methods Comprehensive description of design, setting, population, sample, intervention, and inclusion/exclusion criteria. Mostly complete; minor details missing. Some elements missing or unclear. Design and methods incomplete or missing.
Data Collection & Analysis Plan Clear plan for quantitative/qualitative data collection, measurement tools, statistical tests, and analysis. Adequate plan; minor gaps in detail or specificity. Limited or unclear data collection/analysis plan. No plan or inappropriate methods described.
Ethical Considerations Fully addresses IRB, informed consent, HIPAA, and ethical principles. Mostly addresses ethics; minor gaps. Limited ethical discussion; missing details. Ethics not addressed.
Expected Outcomes & Implications Clearly identifies measurable outcomes and implications for practice, leadership, and sustainability. Outcomes mostly clear; minor gaps. Outcomes vague; limited implications. Outcomes and implications missing or unclear.
Organization & Clarity Well-organized, professional, and clear writing; logical flow of information. Generally clear; minor organizational issues. Some clarity or organizational issues present. Disorganized, unclear, difficult to follow.

 

Read More

Step-by-Step Guide

  1. State the Problem easily—Begin with the clinical or organizational issue, e.g., low drug adherence in hypertensive cases. 
  2. Purpose Statement—Define the end of the DNP design, addressing the intended enhancement in patient issues.
  3. Set SMART objects—Make objects Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Applicable, and Time-bound (e.g., increase adherence by 25 in 6 months). 
  4. Elect a theoretical framework – Apply models like Pender’s Health Promotion Model or Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model to guide intervention planning. 
  5. Literature Support – epitomize substantiation supporting nanny-led and/or digital interventions for adherence enhancement. 
  6. Project Design & Styles – Describe study design (quasi-experimental), setting, population, sample, and addition/rejection criteria. 
  7. Intervention Plan – Detail ways like digital memorial systems, nanny-led education, and motivational support calls. 
  8. Data Collection & Analysis – Specify dimension tools (e.g., MMAS-8, EHR data), statistical tests, and software for analysis. 
  9. Ethical Considerations – Address IRB blessing, informed consent, HIPAA compliance, and Belmont Report principles. 
  10. Anticipated issues & counteraccusations – Predict measurable results (adherence, blood pressure enhancement) and impacts on nursing practice, leadership, and sustainability.
Read More

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ's)

  1. What’s the main purpose of this assessment? 

To develop a structured and confirmation-oriented offer that details your DNP design plan and methodology. 

  1. How long should my offer be? 

Generally 6–8 runners, banning references and supplements.

  1. Do I need to include theoretical fabrics? 

Yes, at least one proposition or model (e.g., Lewin’s Change Theory, Pender’s HPM, or Kotter’s Model) should guide your design. 

  1. What kind of exploration design should I use? 

Most DNP systems use quality enhancement or quasi-experimental designs, depending on feasibility and ethical constraints. 

  1. When should I seek IRB blessing? 

This should be done before any data collection or case commerce commences. 

  1. What are samples of measurable issues? 

Samples include adherence rates, blood pressure situations, patient satisfaction, or readmission rates. 

  1. Should I include a budget or timeline? 

Some proffers include an introductory timeline or resource estimate, especially if demanded by the institution. 

Read More
NURS FPX 9000 Assessment 2

What You'll Get

  • How to pass Assessment
  • Complete assessment outline
  • Step-by-step guide
  • Rubric breakdown
  • Sample introduction
  • APA formatting tips
  • Reference list examples
Download Full Sample

Instant access • No credit card

You cannot copy content of this page

Get Instant Access to Sample Paper

Fill out the form below.